U.S. scientists Accused Of Greed By Republicans For Downplaying Climate Report’s Dire Findings

AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE'S DANIELLE PLETKA. CREDIT: NBC NEWS/SCREENSHOT

AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE’S DANIELLE PLETKA. CREDIT: NBC NEWS/SCREENSHOT


|AIWA! NO!
|CNN|One conservative commentator resurrects former go-to phrase “I’m not a scientist.”null –  By MARK HAND

For all our model motions for Labour conference 2018, see here. For guidance on how conference resolutions work, how to submit, etc, see here.

For all our model motions for Labour conference 2018, see here. For guidance on how conference resolutions work, how to submit, etc, see here.

Conservative lawmakers and commentators spent Sunday downplaying the dire warnings in a much-anticipated climate assessment — released Friday by the Trump administration — going as far to accuse the scientists who worked on the report of perpetuating climate “alarmism” in order to keep their jobs.

The scientists who helped draft the fourth National Climate Assessment, according to former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), were attracted to the money that comes with producing a report that highlights the terrible dangers of climate change.

“The reality is that a lot of these scientists are driven by the money that they receive … from people who support their agenda,” Santorum said Sunday in a panel discussion on CNN.

The former Pennsylvania senator and Republican presidential candidate complained that the report was written by hundreds of scientists in the federal bureaucracy and not Trump appointees.

CNN host Dana Bash shot back: “Meaning they’re nonpolitical.”

But Santorum, who once criticized the Pope for making climate change a moral issue, returned to his argument that job security is driving scientists to conclude that humans are the primary cause of worsening climate change. “If there was no climate change, we’d have a lot of scientists looking for work,” he said Sunday.  TOP ARTICLES2/5READ MORE

Advertisements

One Comment

  1. Scientists looking for work , well there are a whole host of scientific activities we could easily do without . How about a trip to Mars or perhaps a building a telescope on the moon , maybe searching for dark matter is up your street . Might I suggest some of the time and effort could go into finding new antibiotics which are on the brink of becoming obsolete.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.