Britain’s parliament will hold a special sitting on Friday to discuss and vote on Brexit. Huh?

Image result for When is a Brexit vote not a Brexit vote?
Damian Hinds said a second referendum would only prove divisive. — Reuters pic

UK: When is a Brexit vote, not a Brexit vote and was the Brexit referendum a democratic one? AIWA! NO!

Britain’s parliament will hold a special sitting on Friday to discuss and vote on Brexit, potentially unlocking a delay to May 22 to the country’s exit from the European Union but falling short of the criteria needed to formally ratify the deal.

‘Where is my Brexit?’; May demands a straight answer

Boris Johnson in major U-turn as he says he will back Brexit deal after PM says she will quit
Democracy is not just “if you can get a majority to vote for it, it goes”

The government hopes to avoid another heavy defeat on the deal by separating the two elements which make up the exit package: a legal Withdrawal Agreement covering the terms of the split and a Political Declaration on a long-term relationship.

The Brexit referendum was not democractic.
The Brexit referendum was undemocractic.

The two documents together have been rejected twice already by parliament. Under British law, the deal cannot be ratified without securing parliament’s approval for both parts.


On Friday, the government will ask parliament to debate and vote on the Withdrawal Agreement alone. Theresa May’s last ditch attempt to get her Brexit deal through Parliament received a boost today as Boris Johnson said he would back her. The architect of the Leave campaign said he had reluctantly decided to back her deal so we can leave the EU in May.

Labour will not back a fresh attempt by Theresa May to win support for her Brexit deal, Keir Starmer has said.
Those in the chattering classes who are sympathetic to the choice of some of the British people to leave the European Union are starting to insist that it was an act of democratic self-determination, and that those of us (myself included) who think it was an utter disaster that should be stopped by any legal means are violating some kind of norm of democratic respect.


If government wins the vote, it believes it will have satisfied the conditions set by the EU in order to delay Britain’s exit from the bloc until May 22. These conditions were set out at a European Council summit on March 21.

However, the result will not meet the criteria in British law for the exit package to be formally ratified. The government acknowledges this in its motion.

In order to ratify the Withdrawal Agreement, the government is required to have parliamentary approval for both the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration on future relations. This would therefore require another separate vote at a future date.


May’s Conservatives do not have a majority in the 650-seat parliament, relying on the 10 lawmakers of Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) to prop up her government.

The Brexit deal was defeated first by a record 230 votes on Jan. 15 and then by 149 votes on March 12.

To overturn the March 12 result, she would need at least 75 lawmakers to change their minds. The DUP and several hardline pro-Brexit Conservatives who object to parts of the Withdrawal Agreement have already said they will keep on rejecting the deal.

Therefore success depends on how effectively May can minimise the rebellion in her own party and how many lawmakers from the opposition Labour Party she can win over.

Labour’s Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer said on Thursday the party would not support the Withdrawal Agreement alone as this would leave Britain with the “blindest of blindfold Brexits”.

Trump revives threat to close U.S.-Mexico border


Lawmakers are due to take control of parliamentary business on Monday, April 1 when they will likely vote on a narrowed-down list of alternative Brexit plans, designed to discover if there is a majority in parliament for any next step.

This follows a series of votes on Wednesday, in which eight possible options were debated and voted upon, but none won a clear majority.

Reporting by William James; editing by Stephen Addison/Guy Faulconbridge

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.