Who do these people threatening no Brexit at all think they are?

Brexit: Remain protesters confront people on Nigel Farage’s Brexit ‘betrayal’ march

Nigel Farage at the launch of the so-called Brexit 'betrayal' march in Sunderland
Nigel Farage at the launch of the so-called Brexit ‘betrayal’ march in Sunderland ( Getty Images )

Remain protesters clashed with members of a march launched by Nigel Farage today aimed protesting against a perceived Brexit“betrayal”.

The March to Leave set off from Sunderland on Saturday morning, and will make its way down to London over a 14-day period, arriving in the capital on March 29, where a mass rally will take place on Parliament Square.

Leading a contingent of protesters, Nigel Farage said: “The will of the people is very clear.

“If you see what has been happening in Parliament this week, we may well not be leaving the EU.

“If politicians think they can walk all over us, then we’re going to march back and tell them they can’t. Simple as that.”

Pro EU activists at the start of Nigel Farage’s Brexit ‘betrayal’ march (Getty Images)

The event has been arranged by the Leave Means Leave campaign, and will proceed towards Hartlepool on Saturday, a trip of around 20 miles, before proceeding on to Middlesbrough on Sunday.

The campaign’s website says tickets to be “core marchers”, who pay £50 to get fully-paid accommodation, breakfast and dinner for the duration of the 14-day event, have sold out.

The start of the first leg of the March to Leave the EU (AP)

Angry rows broke out as the march started, with several counter-protesters assembling in order to get their views across. Anti-Brexit campaigners have dubbed Mr Farage’s march the “Gammonball run”.

They were carrying love hearts bearing messages like “we love workers’ rights” and “we love to have a say”, but some marchers responded by calling them “EU money grabbers”.

The counter-protesters were also told to respect the 2016 referendum result, with one man waving a fake blue passport in their direction.

Nigel Farage sets off on the first leg of the 14-stage Brexit march (Getty Images)

As Mr Farage arrived, a flare was set off with the EU colours, with shouts of “exit Brexit” emanating form the counter-protesters.

It is understood that two two advertising vans, made by the anti-Brexit grassroots campaign Led By Donkeys, will also be following the march.

Barry Lockey, who arrived in Sunderland carrying a flag with the message “Get Britain out: Time to leave the EU”, said that the event is about supporting democracy.

He said: “The democracy in the Parliament building has been spot on. They’ve got their no-deal taken off the table by four votes.”

Mr Lockey pointed out that this margin was much smaller than the 4% margin of victory during the EU referendum, which he said is now being discredited.

He added: “I’m sorry, but that really riles me. And they’re not going to get away with it.

“They’re going to get kicked out, them people, and they’re an absolute damned disgrace.”

In contrast, one counter-protester told the Press Association “it’s going to be a disaster if we leave.”

Frank Hindle, 66, said: “We’re here to point out that not everybody agrees with this crowd, who think it’s going to be wonderful if we leave.”

Discussing the no-deal Brexit that many of the marchers are calling for, he said: “The impact that will have on businesses and on prices, and on the availability of things like medicines and so forth, it doesn’t bear thinking about.”

Advertisements
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern confirmed 49 people have been confirmed dead and more than 20 injured after shooters opened fire in two mosques in a terrorist attack in Christchurch today. The prime minister described the attack as one of New Zealand’s “darkest days”. New Zealand police confirmed three suspect are currently in custody following the attack.

Muslims have good reason to be wary of the first words from politicians’ mouths (or Twitter feed) after a terrorist attack- when describing the Christchurch mosque attack, let’s call it what it is — ‘terrorism’

A police officer patrols at a cordon near a mosque in central Christchurch, New Zealand, Friday, March 15, 2019. Multiple people were killed in mass shootings at two mosques full of worshippers attending Friday prayers on what the prime minister called "one of New Zealand's darkest days," as authorities detained four people and defused explosive devices in what appeared to be a carefully planned attack.
A police officer patrols at a cordon near a mosque in central Christchurch, New Zealand, Friday, March 15, 2019. Multiple people were killed in mass shootings at two mosques full of worshippers attending Friday prayers on what the prime minister called “one of New Zealand’s darkest days,” as authorities detained four people and defused explosive devices in what appeared to be a carefully planned attack.Mark Baker/AP Photo

The terror attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on Friday hit too close to home for me.

Every day I drop my child off at an Islamic school that invites its students on Fridays to attend the beautiful communal prayer services held in the mosque that adjoins it — the same Friday prayer services that worshippers have been attacked at by a white supremacist gunman in Quebec City, and now in Christchurch, New Zealand.

Many Canadian Muslims will attest to the sudden rush of fear they felt after Alexandre Bissonnette opened fire in a Quebec City mosque and killed six people two years ago on Jan. 29. Jewish Canadians in particular would be able to empathize: The feeling was similar after the Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh last year that left 11 dead during morning Shabbat services.

READ MORE: COMMENTARY: You can lock up perpetrators of hate crimes, but the online vitriol that motivates them only grows

In the weeks and months after the Quebec City shooting, I would sit in my car for a few moments after dropping my daughter off at school, in a cloud of jumbled thoughts. What if a deranged shooter entered the school or mosque? Were the administrators prepared to respond to a terror attack? Why was I even choosing to send her to an Islamic school if I knew the risks that came along with it? But if I pulled her out, wouldn’t I be caving into the fear that white supremacists wanted me to feel?

The mosque adjoining the school has been the target of hateful vandalism once before. As upsetting as that incident was, I never felt the community was under threat. But if it happened in Quebec City, why couldn’t it happen in Toronto?

I have no doubt that people across New Zealand and Australia are wondering the same thing. Police in Christchurch called for all mosques in the city to shut down after 49 people were killed and at least 48 were seriously injured, including children, in the shootings at two mosques. Reports indicate that one gunman is an Australian who is believed to have written a manifesto outlining his intentions. In it, he espouses far-right and anti-immigrant ideology.

WATCH: World leaders react to Christchurch mosque attacks

As with coverage of all terror attacks, the narrative — the way a story is shaped and told by the politicians, police and the news media — is crucial to how the public understands it. Importantly, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern described the shootings as a terrorist attack. Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison described the suspected attacker as an “extremist right-wing violent terrorist”.

Why does this matter? Because attacks committed by Muslims are often immediately reported as a terrorist attack, whereas attacks by non-Muslims are pretty much never perceived to be.

Take the example of a shooting at a Las Vegas music festival in 2017 that killed 58 people and left 869 injured. The gunman was a 64-year-old white man. According to the Las Vegas Sheriff, this was clearly a case of mass murder, and although he personally called it a terrorist attack, it didn’t meet the federal definition of one.

READ MORE: FBI finds no motive in Las Vegas mass shooting carried out by Stephen Paddock

A day before that, a police officer in Edmonton was thrown into the air after being hit by a U-Haul truck driven by a Somali Muslim man. Abdulahi Hasan Sharif allegedly stabbed the officer with a knife before running off and hitting four other people with a second car. Police in Edmonton, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Canadian news outlets quickly referred to this story as a terrorist attack, largely because police found what appeared to be an ISIS flag inside the driver’s car. But more than a year later, the suspect has still not been charged with terrorism-related offences.

In other words, if it had been a Muslim gunman, motivated by religious or political ideology, that had attacked a church in New Zealand, the words “terrorist” and “terror attack” would have been used a lot more liberally.

WATCH: Ardern condemns ‘extreme’ ideology of shooting suspects

Muslims have good reason to be wary of the first words that come out of a politician’s mouth (or Twitter feed) after a terrorist attack. After the New Zealand tragedy, Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer was the first Canadian party leader to respond. But his words felt far from empathetic.

Andrew Scheer@AndrewScheer

Freedom has come under attack in New Zealand as peaceful worshippers are targeted in a despicable act of evil. All people must be able to practice their faith freely and without fear. 1/21,5803:08 AM – Mar 15, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy1,434 people are talking about this

“Freedom has come under attack in New Zealand as peaceful worshippers are targeted in a despicable act of evil,” he posted. “All people must be able to practice their faith freely and without fear.” Writer Andray Domise responded: “You haven’t even named the religion being practiced, or the type of house of worship wherein the people in Christchurch were attacked. Why is that?”

Paul Adams, a journalism professor at Carleton University, noted the aloofness of Scheer’s statement. “By framing this as an attack on freedom, Scheer tries to disassociate himself with the general disgust and condemnation of the incident but direct that feeling away from its obvious target – Islamophobia – to a value associate with his rhetorical line,” he said.

Freelance journalist Davide Mastracci also responded to Scheer by posting an image of him being interviewed by Rebel Media, an overtly racist Canadian far-right political and social commentary site. “Who you choose to spend time with says a lot more than this tweet, where you conveniently leave out that the attack happened at a mosque,” Mastracci wrote.

Words matter — including the ones that are not used.

It’s always worth remembering that horrific events motivated by hate often have a ripple effect, even if they are oceans away. It’s something I’ll be thinking about as I drop off my daughter again to school next week with a heavy heart. But I must also recall the words and acts of compassion our community received after the Quebec City mosque attacks — the protective ring of peace that people of all faiths and none formed around our mosque in freezing temperatures for example — and the subsequent one we formed around a local Toronto synagogue after the Pittsburgh attack.

Love can overcome hate. And if anyone can demonstrate that, it’s Canadians.

Shenaz Kermalli is a freelance journalist and journalism instructor at Ryerson University.

https://aiwa.press/2019/03/13/brexit-crisis-investment-banks-such-as-goldman-sachs-and-jpmorgan-see-a-55-per-cent-chance-a-variant-of-mays-brexit-deal-ratified-after-a-three-month-extension-of-article-50-goldman-said/

Trump taunts Theresa May over Brexit. The US President says he’s ‘surprised to see how badly it’s all gone’

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the Friends of Ireland Luncheon in honor of Ireland Prime Minister Leo Varadkar at the U.S. Capitol on March 14, 2019 in Washington, | Pool photo by Olivier-Douliery via Getty Images
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the Friends of Ireland Luncheon in honor of Ireland Prime Minister Leo Varadkar at the U.S. Capitol on March 14, 2019 in Washington, | Pool photo by Olivier-Douliery via Getty Images

CRIMSON TAZVINZWA, AIWA! NO!| Donald Trump criticizes Theresa May for ‘how badly’ Brexit talks have gone but fails to see his own failures back in the US

Trump Claims He Gave Theresa May Ideas On Negotiating Brexit But ‘She Didn’t Listen’ | TIME

Excuse me Mr. President! British Prime Minister Theresa May ‘warned’ you against gov’t shutdown – a ‘made-up fight’ so you ‘can look like you were fighting and winning’, which you lost by the way and continue to lose to this day.

Theresa May also warned you against your cozy relationship with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and Russia’s Putin. Instead in your grandiose and braggadocios language of flattery you said “gets along” with the North Korean dictator, despite Kim’s record of human rights offenses. And then comes the Vietnam Summit … which collapsed only to land with a thud on its back, and from the summit at that.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un may break off denuclearisation talks with the US and resume missile and nuclear testing, a senior official says.


North Korea says the US is “gangster-like”, but Mr Trump and Mr Kim have “wonderful” chemistry.

BBC NEWS

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun-hui told foreign diplomats the US threw away “a golden opportunity” at a recent summit between President Trump and Mr Kim.

North Korea had offered to dismantle its main Yongbyon nuclear complex.

But talks collapsed after Mr Trump refused to lift sanctions unless North Korea destroyed all its nuclear sites.

Will the EU let Britain delay Brexit?

UK: Overwhelming majority of Tory members want Prime Minister Theresa May to resign


Will the EU let Britain delay Brexit?
Will the EU let Britain delay Brexit?

A new survey by ConservativeHome has found that 61% of Conservative Party members believe that “Theresa May should resign as Prime Minister and Party leader.” Just 36% think she shouldn’t.

Last night’s House of Commons vote on a no-deal Brexit has greatly reduced — though not eliminated — the chances of Britain crashing out of the EU at the end of March. A vote tonight on extending Article 50 is expected to succeed. If it does, the Prime Minister would need to ask Brussels for such an extension, which would need to be agreed to by all 27 national governments. And so the all-important question becomes what the EU response is likely to be.

capx

This comes as the former chairman of Theresa May’s Downing Street Policy Board, George Freeman, has openly called for a fresh leadership contest as a condition for getting her deal over the line. 

  •   All extension scenarios make a softer Brexit, or no Brexit at all, more likely
  •   Brussels is unlikely to say no to an extension, but everything depends on why the UK is asking for a delay
  •   Some in government are quietly confident of the chances of a third Meaningful Vote passing
I think the European Union will come back and say let's take another couple of weeks and negotiate David Davis

The UK voted to never not do nothing on Brexit. Got it?

But whatever tonight’s vote might suggest about the will of MPs, it doesn’t actually change anything legally—meaning a “no deal” Brexit could still be in the offing.
Leaving in disarray.

But whatever tonight’s vote might suggest about the will of MPs, it doesn’t actually change anything legally—meaning a “no deal” Brexit could still be in the offing.

By Natasha Frost, QUARTZ

UK politicians voted Wednesday (March 13) against leaving the EU without a deal outlining the terms of its separation from the bloc. The final tally was 321 votes in favour of taking a “no-deal” Brexit off the table, 278 votes against, with a number of Tory rebels flouting their leader and voting for the amended motion.

It is yet another humiliating defeat for British prime minster Theresa May, whose amended Brexit deal was defeated last night (March 12) for a second time since January by an overwhelming majority.

The meaning of tonight’s vote for the future of the country is difficult to discern. The vote reveals the will of politicians, but not much beyond that. It is not legally binding, for instance. A second Brexit referendum, as opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn supports, remains a possibility.

Parliament will vote tomorrow on whether to extend Brexit negotiations and delay a March 29 departure from the EU in attempt to buy themselves more time. But that extension request is still subject to the approval of the EU’s 27 member states. A no-deal exit remains a prospect if an agreement isn’t reached during the extension.

There is a possibility that a third vote on May’s deal may also take place before or during the transition period. May has encouraged MPs to vote for her deal if they wished to definitively rule out a “no deal” exit. If they cannot, the UK will need to seek a longer extension, which would force them to take part in European Parliament elections in late May.

The outcome of tonight’s vote will come as a temporary relief to UK-based companies and businesses, who stand to take a hit in the event of a “no deal” Brexit. If the country left the bloc (membership) with no deal or transition structure in place, British financial services would be shut out of any work on the continent. Current forecasts suggest that a no-deal Brexit could slash economic growth by about 7.6% (pdf) in the long term.

But whatever tonight’s vote might suggest about the will of MPs, it doesn’t actually change anything legally—meaning a “no deal” Brexit could still be in the offing.