The Department of Justice will not prosecute former FBI director James Comey after an internal probe of Comey’s handling of memos he kept of his interactions with President Donald Trump.
In a report released Thursday, the Office of the Inspector General said its probe found that Comey violated department policy.
“Upon completing its investigation, the OIG provided its factual findings to the Justice Department for a prosecutorial decision regarding Comey’s conduct, as required by the Inspector General Act. After reviewing the matter, the DOJ declined prosecution,” the office said in a statement.
The report detailed how the inspector general “found no evidence that Comey or his attorneys released any of the classified information contained in any of the Memos to members of the media,” though Inspector General Michael Horowitz said Comey’s “retention, handling, and dissemination of certain Memos violated Department and FBI policies, and his FBI Employment Agreement.”
Comey responded to the report on Thursday, tweeting: “I don’t need a public apology from those who defamed me, but a quick message with a “sorry we lied about you” would be nice.”
House Democrats on both Judiciary and Intelligence Committees spent months preparing Mueller testimony before Congress to answer lingering questions about his 22-month investigation.
The fixer: May 7, 2019
Mueller was reluctant to appear before Congress, and only agreed to appear under subpoena from both panels.
“The report is my testimony,” he said in his only public statement on the report in May.
Trump culpability for crimes he is alleged to have committed divides opinion and conclusions along partisan lines with Republicans seeking to rubbish Mueller report.
5 ‘shocking evidence of criminal misconduct’ by Trump:
Repeatedly directing his then-White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller
Telling McGahn to deny that he had been ordered to fire Mueller
Asking former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to deliver a message to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to limit the investigation to exclude the president
Telling Lewandowski to let Sessions know that he’s fired if he doesn’t meet with Lewandowski
Potential witness tampering with Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen.
The former special counsel is set to appear before the Judiciary and Intelligence committees Wednesday.
WASHINGTON — Democrats on the House committees set to hear testimony next week from former special counsel Robert Mueller believe the hearings will help Americans understand “the gravity of the president’s misconduct,” staff members told reporters.
“It is not that that there will be a big, dramatic new revelation necessarily, we’re not expecting that,” a Democratic staffer on the Judiciary Committee said Thursday in a briefing ahead of the hearings. “What’s important is there is truly shocking evidence of criminal misconduct by the president — not once but again and again and again — that would result in any other American being criminally charged in a multiple count indictment.”
The committees are anticipating that “not everybody is reading the book (Mueller’s report) but people will watch the movie,” an aide said.
Mueller is expected to appear publicly Wednesday for three hours before the Judiciary Committee followed by roughly two hours before the House Intelligence Committee.
During his public statement in May after the report was complete, he said, “The report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.”
Trump said Friday that he wouldn’t be watching the hearings.
But both committees want to dig into Mueller’s evidence, not necessarily the conclusions — or lack thereof — laid out in his report. Democratic staffers believe the former special counsel will “lean into” the factual findings that his team made.
“Our focus is really going to be to have the special counsel talk about what the evidence is that he found, less about what the legal conclusion was, because some of the actual evidence is very concerning and has not received the attention it’s due,” an Intelligence Committee staffer said.
Mueller’s report did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its interference in the 2016 election.
On obstruction of justice, Mueller left it to Attorney General William Barr to choose whether to bring obstruction charges against the president; Barr declined to do so, he told Congress, based on the evidence presented and Department of Justice guidelines around prosecuting a sitting president.
The Mueller report makes it clear that Trump was not exonerated but it simply found insufficient criminal evidence to prosecute.
The Judiciary Committee hopes to show that if any other American had engaged in the same conduct as Trump did as detailed in the 400-plus page Mueller report, they would be charged for obstruction of justice.
Democratic lawmakers plan to highlight at least five instances they believe clearly show Trump committed a crime, the staffers said.
Democrats on the Judiciary Committee will highlight these actions by Trump as detailed in the report: Repeatedly directing his then-White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller; telling McGahn to deny that he had been ordered to fire Mueller; asking former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to deliver a message to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to limit the investigation to exclude the president; telling Lewandowski to let Sessions know that he’s fired if he doesn’t meet with Lewandowski; and potential witness tampering with Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen.
“Mr. McGahn is very much on our mind as you’ll also see at the hearing,” a staffer said.
Trump’s WWE Event in the Oval Office Turned Into a Massive Self-Own
To impeach President Trump or not to impeach; and if, then when to impeach – The real question|CRIMSON TAZVINZWA||
To be, or not to be, that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles
And by opposing end them. To die—to sleep,
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to: ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d … ,
the law’s delay,
The insolence of office, and the spurns that patient merit of th’unworthy takes//WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE(from Hamlet, spoken by Hamlet)
Going out of tested and tried time
Routine
It’s been done this way before, it worked, therefore it should work this time as well for nothing has changed; all elements still equal and constant. There is no reason for doubt whatsoever.
Converse;
They tried it on us before remember – during president Bill Clinton ‘impeachment in 1990s; it spectacularly backfired and exploded into their face didn’t it; meaning the ‘Grand Old Party’ (GOP); therefore it is pretty much the same, outcomewise, politically – better off avoded like a skunk – to avoid de javu.
Who said? Sounds like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi argument.
It is just that politics, morality and ethics aren’t good company.
The federal agency that enforces the Hatch Act found that White House counselor Kellyanne Conway violated the law on “numerous occasions” while serving in her official capacity as President Donald Trump’s White House adviser.
The US Office of Special Counsel said Conway did so by “disparaging Democratic presidential candidates” while appearing in her role as White House counselor “during television interviews and on social media.”
The watchdog said that given that Conway is a “repeat offender” who has “shown disregard for the law,” she should be removed from federal office.
The White House has final say on whether Conway will be removed, and it released a statement standing by her and calling the OSC’s decision “deeply flawed.”
The statement continued, saying, “Perhaps OSC should be mindful of its own mandate to act in a fair, impartial, non-political manner, and not misinterpret or weaponize the Hatch Act.”
