G7 to launch rapid response unit against ‘hostile’ states

Donald Trump left the G7 early, protesting ‘We are like the piggy bank that everyone is robbing’ ( Reuters )

Leaders of G7 countries have agreed the creation of a rapid response unit to combat hostile state activity, warning that “interference by Russia and other foreign states” would not be tolerated.

The UK, who spearheaded the initiative, said a more coordinated approach was needed in the wake of a series of aggressive behaviour attributed to Russia, including the attempted murder of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal in Salisbury and the 2017 ‘NotPetya’ cyber-attack.

The ransomware which was initially targeted at Ukraine, spread around the world impacting major multinationals. Russia denies being behind either of these attacks.

“There is no doubt that foreign interference in our democratic institutions and processes, and other forms of hostile activity, pose a strategic threat to our shared values and interests,” British Prime Minister Theresa May said at the G7 Summit on Saturday.

“Today’s announcement shows that the G7 will not tolerate foreign interference in any one of our democracies, that we are getting organised, and that we will take coordinated action against those who seek to violate the rules-based international system.

The agreement is based on greater intelligence sharing between the countries of the G7 group of industrialised nations — Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK and the US — and aims to identify, prevent and respond to hostile state activity including cyber-attacks. It also calls for co-ordinated attribution of hostile activity and the improvement of physical and digital infrastructure.

May also lobbied for additional measures including measures to stop illicit money flows undermining democracies and more information-sharing so that Russians expelled from one country do simply enter another.

A rapid response unit to combat hostile state action ranging from cyber-attacks to poisonings has been agreed by G7 members meeting in Québec.

The launch of the initiative, which has been led by Theresa May, was at odds with Donald Trump’s call to readmit Russia to the G7. May said her view on dealing with Russia was to “engage but beware”.

“We should remind ourselves why the G8 became the G7 – it was because Russia illegally annexed Crimea,” she said. “We have seen malign activity from Russia in a whole variety of ways, of course including on the streets of Salisbury in the UK.

“So we need to say, I think, before any such conversations can take place, Russia needs to change its approach.”

Downing Street sources indicated later that although there were points of difference between May and Trump, the president had been robust in attributing blame for Russia’s hostile actions in the US and the UK.

May discussed details of the proposals for the rapid response unit in bilateral meetings with France’s Emmanuel Macron and Germany’s Angela Merkel as the G7 summit got under way.

The plans amount to a formalisation of the response that May worked hard to achieve after the Russian former spy Sergei Skripal was targeted in an assassination attempt in Salisbury in March.

May persuaded more than 20 allies to expel Russian diplomats, although the response varied significantly – the US expelled 40, Germany just four. The patchy response reflected May’s struggle to build a united front against Russia.

One of the objectives of the initiative is described as “improving understanding of partner countries’ polices and thresholds for taking action”.

May said the announcement in Québec showed the G7 was united in its intolerance of foreign interference. “We are getting organised, and … we will take coordinated action against those who seek to violate the rules based international system,” she said.

The proposals include greater sharing of intelligence around potential threats and techniques to combat them.

May said calling out such activity would “help to end hostile states’ false sense of impunity, demonstrate our awareness of their activity and underline our unwavering willingness to defend ourselves”.

More coordinated action with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which spearheaded the independent investigation into the Skripal poisoning, is planned. There will be a meeting in London in the coming weeks to consider ways of strengthening the OPCW’s role.

May has called for more cooperation to understand and detect illicit money flows and to agree on concrete action “to stop dirty money undermining our democracies”.

Last month the cross-party foreign affairs committee of MPs said the government was putting national security at risk by allowing “kleptocrats and human rights abusers to use the City of London to launder their ill-gotten funds to circumvent sanctions”.

The MPs said that despite May’s rhetoric in the wake of the Skripal affair, nothing had changed. “These assets, on which the Kremlin can call at any time, both directly and indirectly support President Putin’s campaign to subvert the international rules-based system, undermine our allies and erode the mutually reinforcing international networks that support UK foreign policy.”

On the day the report was published in May, it emerged that the Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich, regarded as a close Putin ally, had not had his visa renewed. He has since put on hold plans for £1bn investment in the football club’s new stadium, and the future of his ownership of Chelsea is thought to be in doubt.

But with Trump calling for Russia to be readmitted to the G7, from which it was suspended after the Crimea invasion, and the new Italian government questioning sanctions against Russia, there is still a rough road ahead for May’s plans. They will come up at a bilateral meeting between May and the Italian prime minister, Giuseppe Conti, on the margins of the G7 summit.

One comment

  1. Just a few points to clarify the above. 1. The people of Crimea voted by a wide margin to join Russia and leave the Ukraine. Thus, it appears that labelling the union of Crimea and Russia as an illegal annexation is stretching the truth. 2. As to chemical weapons, the Skirpal incident has been discredited, at least the British blaming Russia has fallen out of favor with much of the world as the British could not back up their knee jerk claims. Theresa May along with Trump and Macron would not even wait for the OPCW to investigate the alleged chemical attack by Assad in Syria several weeks ago before attacking Syria by air and with missiles. Decisions to commit acts of war are now made on the basis of hearsay. Not only did Assad not use chemical weapons in April, but nobody used them. It turns out the whole thing was a fraud.

    One may wonder about all this complaining about interference from foreign powers in Western democracies at this time. These globalist puppets (such as May and Merkel), who seek to permanently alter the character of Western nations and values , are now facing a backlash in Europe over their problematic policies. It seems that they desire to divert the public’s attention by making Russia into a bogeyman.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.